What
We Are Doing And Why!
by Ron McBride
January 8, 2007
This past
election, I and 11 others got together here in our home and made
calls for MoveOn, for candidates in districts other than ours, as
far as I know they did nothing for our local Candidate in IL-19,
although I was told they would.
As I was
reading a script in support of a democratic candidate I know nothing
about, who for all I know has been written about negatively else
where, it dawned on me that this wasn't the way it should be.
First and
foremost we should know about the candidate we are supporting, either
with phone calling, handing out literature, or just talking to someone
about the election. It made me feel good that I was accomplishing
something, but I also felt guilty that we weren't calling for our
candidate.
I honestly
think that we have to first and foremost support our local candidates
before all others. This is where our precinct organizers come in
they are the ground troops who support local candidates, our County
Coordinators coordinate the various precincts under them so that
each precinct gets the most efficient results, the CC can move people
from one precinct to another, with out long road trips, or having
their members operating in strange towns were they would need maps
and have to feel out of place.
State Coordinators
who oversee the County Coordinators fill the same functions on the
State Level.
Our system
alters the way things are normally done, ours forces progressives
to talk to non-progressives, and to gain a realistic understanding
of how other people see our political world.
Most campaigns
identify citizens by party registration, giving workers long lists
of names, addresses and phone numbers. But shouldn't we be identifying
those other voters, such as a green or middle of the road republican?
These are a source of new Democrats, which we as activist have to
reach. And new voters are the lifeblood of any party.
One of WeDemocrats
goals is to construct a database that not only identifies these
voters, but makes up lists, usable lists of for example; say green
voters or people who live near a factory or dangerous power plant,
then taking these generated lists, produce a phone script with an
answer list made up before hand that our members could use, to call
those on the produced list, we wouldn't have to fight cost of ads,
or worry about how these voters would find obscure websites, if
they even have accessibility to a computer to do so. Not only would
this improve our members ability to engage people politically, it
would advance the progressive movement by leaps and bounds.
Don't get
me wrong, I think that the netroots is a wave of the future in politics,
it allows us to communicate and exchange ideas quickly, and we can
present our literature online to an unbelievably huge audience.
But most of the non-electoral campaigns are more local than are
the every four-year Presidential ones. A combination of the grassroots
tools and the netroots reach, we can be that new wave in American
Politics.
We must
communicate with people from other parts of the political spectrum,
or work together toward similar goals. I know some of you are not
fans of coalitions, but our vote is essentially meaningless if you
can't get the voter to also put pressure on their representative
after the election is won. The representative will cave in to other
interests. Then you'll get the same people coming back, two years
later, to 'get out the vote'. Meanwhile, those two years had real
consequences... Short-term tactics today begets more short-term
tactics tomorrow. Build for the future today, not "after the
election". In a coalition of progressives such as the one WeDemocrats.org
is building we will be able to apply pressure on those representatives,
to keep their feet to the fire as my dearly departed Daddy used
to say.
If we vote
and don't do the follow up, then the effort is largely wasted, it's
the politics as usual for those in Washington. Before you ask, no
this doesn't mean we shouldn't focus on GOTV, but it means we must
do more.
People ask
me "what will that vote actually do for me" when I ask
them to vote for my candidate. I can't give them a speech about,
its for the good of the Party or of the Country, they want to know
what it will do for them now in the days following this election,
and if I am not prepared I look like an idiot standing there with
my hat in my hand, embarrassed and stammering. I read once "Liberty
cannot be given. it can only be taken." Something I think to
do with Ancient Rome. If we can't explain to the voter how he has
to help himself, how he can't wait for someone to notice and take
care of him down the road, then we are going to lose that voter,
and the next, and the next.
I think
democrats are more likely to listen to the people than republicans
are, and therefore this "blue tide" is a good thing. I
also think they will do more to preserve civil liberties, and possibly
even make some progress on human rights. Although a lot of the Democrats
are in a hurry to put a lot of our priorities at the bottom of their
lists if they can. But if this is a "tide" we must remember
that tides come in, but they go back out. We have to build an organization
that will dam up the "tide", make it stay "in".
We've got
a war going on, and advocacy groups who allegedly oppose it should
stand up to it, not pander to those who do. Why doesn't MoveOn with
its 3 million members come out with a strong stand against the war,
I don't know but I know in my heart they should.
As a progressive
organization we cannot take the easy way and makes peace with war,
we cannot abdicate our responsibility as others have done. By doing
so groups like DFA and MoveOn have created a vacuum. Ironically,
both groups that became Internet phenomena's by recognizing and
filling a void, now they are creating one. WeDemocrats.org has emerged
to fill it.
Another
emerging organization is Progressive Democrats of America, also
a new national group with an activist focus on the Iraq war that
is laudably straightforward. "We're organizing a new campaign
in every congressional district we can to call for the end of funding
for war and occupation, and for the transfer of reconstruction assistance
to Iraqis themselves," says Tim Carpenter of PDA. He contends
"public pressure can awaken Congress to an opposition role."
PDA is now an ally of WeDemocrats.org.
What the
right-wing elites have done so successfully over the last 30 and
more years is to develop their own media outlets and find, develop,
and fund the talent that provides the content for those outlets.
Meanwhile, on the progressive side, we have gotten along with a
few lonely voices that are paid for their efforts, plus a certain
number of dedicated people who do the work for the love of the cause.
Naturally, most of those who are not paid for their political work
cannot do it full time. That is the very reason why there is such
an imbalance in media coverage today. We must change the imbalance,
but we must have a comprehensive plan to do so.
This country
needs an organization dedicated to establishing, developing, and
supporting talented researchers, linguists, writers, investigative
reporters, social psychologists, speakers, filmmakers, and cartoonists
who believe in truthful reporting and commentary, and making sure
their work receives wide exposure. Creating and supporting new and
independent media outlets is one of the ways of accomplishing this
goal, and the very reason that WE! Online magazine was developed.
As the Voice of American Progressives.
Won't you
join us, support us and help bring a Progressive America to the
fore?
Ron McBride
www.WeDemocrats.org
ron@wedemocrats.org
|