by Norla Antinoro
January 16, 2007
Sending them to their
room won't stop the battle.
What the various military
plans for Iraq have failed to address will be the downfall of
all of them. What is the actual goal of the American presence
in Iraq, concretely, boldly stated? In order to win or achieve
success at any venture one must first decide how that success
is to be measured. In order to measure success we must have a
clear goal in mind.
Peace in Iraq has a
nice sound to it but is not something we can produce nor enforce.
Peace cannot be handed down by a superior force and then passed
off to lesser trained troops who may side with one or the other
faction to enforce. Peace at gun point is difficult to maintain
at best. Like any punishment based approach it is doomed to failure
the minute the enforcer/parent is out of the room. The only way
to have peace in any place, whether it is the children's bedroom
or a country, is for the people who live there to have a hand
in developing that peace and an investment in its success.
Right now the largest
investment in a stable Iraq is held by the American based oil
companies. Of course it would be lovely for the people who live
in Iraq if some sort of peace could be developed that had a chance
to last but that is not a gift that can be given by outsiders.
Peace in any nation must come from within its own people. And
it does not come form force of arms. It comes from negotiation
and statesmanship.
The Sunni and Shiite
forces neither one have any investment in an American led peace.
Each wants to own Iraq. So nothing we do in the way of forcing
a peace is going to mean anything at all to them. They will simply
wait us out and when we leave the room they will attack each other
again until they resolve their own difficulties or destroy each
other in the attempt.
They will not either
one accept a divided Iraq, part given to the Sunni, part to the
Shiite. They each want the whole thing. We can beat the drums
forever and we will never find a cadence that will get them marching
together.
I maintain that bringing
peace to Iraq is not what we are or should be doing there. Whatever
our original motivation for the war in Iraq, we are now faced
with an unwinnable conflict. To play in this arena is to lose,
for all sides. No one will win this one and the people of Iraq
will pay the ultimate price for the lose-lose situation that exists.
No matter who put us
there, no matter why, we are there and need to leave. If the corporations
want access to the oil fields to develop those resources, they
need to negotiate with the people of Iraq for that privilege.
Taking that access by force of arms is wrong and, as has been
shown more than once, not feasible. IT does not work and we have
demonstrated that. This government is neurotic if it believes
that by doing what has failed again and harder we will be able
to gain the goals that have so far eluded us.
If they insist on staying
in Iraq, then they should pull back to the oil fields and the
bases already established and let the Iraqis handle the situation
in their country. Yes, we stirred the ant hill and caused untold
damage. But we cannot fix it by doing the same thing over and
over again. Poking the same big stick into the already chaotic
ant hill bigger and faster than before will not bring order, it
will merely perpetuate the chaos.
Iraq is not our country.
Peace in Iraq is not ours to give. It is up to the people of Iraq
to make peace with their neighbors and cousins. We cannot impose
such a peace from outside. If imposed, it will not hold. It will
fall apart the minute we relax our vigilance, even if we do establish
a temporary slow down of hostilities.
This truth has been
proven by history, it has been demonstrated in the laboratory,
it is true for every species that learns. Punishment based learning
will disappear when the source of the punishment is gone. Peace
brought from without by force of arms will disappear as soon as
those arms are gone.
To have so many of
the minds of America working at this straw problem is a waste
of resources. We cannot bring peace to Iraq. We cannot establish
stability in that country. The Bush League does not even want
us to do that. They have no interest in the welfare of Iraq or
Iraqis. They only want enough stability to get the oil out and
into their hands.
So we are faced with
a situation where many good people are striving with all their
energy to make a plan work that has no chance of working. They
are thrashing around in the quicksand, which only brings about
a faster sinking into the quagmire. These minds that are trying
to establish a way to implement Bush's 'plan for Iraq' in such
a way that it has a chance of accomplishing something could actually
be doing important work that might improve the welfare of Iraqis
and Americans alike if they were to recognize that the plan they
are trying to fix is unfixable, the war has been lost by all sides
and the field needs to be abandoned.
Bring American troops
home. Provide support to the Iraqi governments own attempts to
rebuild. Negotiate oil development. Negotiate bases for our military.
Accept once and for all that military might can no longer hold
the world in check. It has grown too large and complex for that.
Warlords can no longer rule the earth. Small plots were all they
could ever subdue effectively even in simpler times.
Humanity must move
beyond the bullyboy tactics and embrace rational discourse and
mutual respect.